Εννοείται ότι οι εν Ελλάδι ""ρατσιστές"" δεν έχουν πάρει χαμπάρι. Αν τους ρωτήσεις τι είναι τα γονίδια, σου λένε αρωματικά για την σούπα.
Εδώ είναι ένα από τα εκατοντάδες βιντεάκια του τρισανώμαλου ο οποίος το παίζει και έξυπνος! Προσέξτε τις πηγές, τις αραδιάζει με την οκά σαν να καταλαβαίνει τι παίζει!
Εδώ όμως ο LibertarianRealist ο οποίος επικοινώνησε με μια από τις "πηγές" που βάζει ο evofag στα βιντεάκια του - χωρίς να μπορεί να την κατανοήσει λόγω της υπανθρωπιάς τους - και ο ίδιος ο επιστήμονας Wickerts δηλώνει ανοιχτά: Όσοι πιστεύουν στην ισότητα μεταξύ των φυλών αργά ή γρήγορα, με τον έναν τρόπο ή τον άλλον, είναι ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΙΣΤΕΣ και δεν ξέρουν που τους παν τα 4! Το ίδιο επιβεβαιώνει και ένας άλλος επιστήμονας με μουνί. Πούτσα λοιπόν evofag, η ψυχοπάθειά σου αναλύεται στο παρακάτω βίντεο.
Η στιχομυθία μου με τον biglundi πριν με μπλοκάρει ο evofag
me
No argument here. The guy says that proof of heritability of trait x is finding some genes "associated" with trait x. Associated means we found some genes and we checked the statistical correlation of their sequence and the trait. There's no other way than correlation. So his argument is you have to correlate genes, not phenotype, in order to find the proof and not inference of what you want. But phenotype is correlated perfectly with gene clustering so phenotypic correlation equals to proof.
Tell me, what does a Papuan New Guinean cluster with?
BigLundi
go to 1.usa. gov/ r1sBOz table 2
A random PNG dude can cluster with specific genes (called gene cluster), of this table or a specially created and known to scientists new PNG gene cluster. These gene clusters, as you see, correlate perfectly with various (not all) phenotypes, so when you're testing the relation between these phenotypes and various trais, you're associating specific known genes with that trait. This means, in EvoFag's words and principles, you're proving heritability. You lose.
Race Realist GR
You're an idiot. Nobody denies heritability. Evogen himself says that the heritability of IQ is 75%.
The difference is that you and other ill informed ****s are saying the racial IQ gap is purely due to genetics. In order to say that, you need to know the genes to point to that differ between blacks and whites.
Also, Papua New Guineans and Andaman Islanders look exactly like Africans, but they don't cluster with africans, they cluster with Austronesians and even Asians. Weird huh?
BigLundi
IQ gap is not purely but mainly to genetics. If you control for environment is purely genetics though. If blacks and whites are on the same school or families their differences would be due to genetics only. But such an isolation cannot exist in real life. If the parents of black people are genetically inferior they affect the environment of their sons. Environment-genetics differences are not a thing to play with and certainly to build upon them affirmative action & other socialist absurdities.
Race Realist GR
"But such an isolation cannot exist in real life." Well you clearly have no idea what stereotype threat studies do. They equalize the enviornment for blacks and whites, and the blacks do just as well as the whites during testing, UNTIL they become aware they're being judged on the basis of their race, then the black students begin to decline. Affirmative Action is absurd, but it's a good idea to find ways to give the different skin colors a level playing field.
BigLundi
You have your facts wrong. Admitting it is honesty. There is no unstereotyped iq test in which blacks did so good as whites did. Stereotype threat is of the utmost importance in jews, yet it works to the benefit of them. Whoever told you that blacks are equal to whites lied to you & as a smart kid you should understand that in Africa prior to colonization no stereotype prevented blacks from finding the wheel. "Leveling the field" by penalizing intelligence, evolution & success leads to failure.
Race Realist GR
Well let's see. It isn't blacks and whites but latinos did just as good as asian americans on a math exam when stereotype threat was not induced in the paper: Stereotype Boost and Stereotype Threat Effects: The Moderating Role of Ethnic Identification - Brian E. Armenta
For blacks and whites, and watching blacks actually do BETTER than whites on average, see The Difference Isn't Black and White: Stereotype Threat and the Race Gap
on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices by Brown and Day.
BigLundi
Your friend had so much to say that he blocked me.
The stereotype threat is induced in the paper? So whites take a math test & ****s draw circles, lest they feel threatened by dead white man science? "On Interpreting Stereotype Threat as Accounting for African American--White Differences on Cognitive Tests". All these are totally unscientific. Stereotype threat, in its literal meaning, has the adverse effects, it makes you better, see Jews. You have no argument, you're a creationist.
Blacks have average IQ OF 85 and less & whites have average IQ of 100, taking random samples, performing under real life circumstances equally judged by no one (when you're taking a test you're not being judged, u just think & write). Bye bye