I am an anticommunist libertarian, but currently a member of Golden Dawn in Greece, so I can say I know and have done more for this ideology than most of you and I’d like to express my sorrow for this site which although is dedicated to the cause of empowering the White Race (so to speak) is not at all dedicated to learning anything during the process.

This narrative is bosh if there isn’t a firm ideology to back it up. So talking about a narrative is talking about nothing. And even referring the word narrative sounds foolish.

The first thing we do when talking to others (even though some of us just want to fight them and kill them for there is something Jewish in them) is to know their political positions. The first thing there is to learn in this case, just by googling and having some knowledge, is that this blackadiclizzard boy is a mutualist and a racialist. His youtube channel by the same name and his gibberish here proves it. This means he (says he) is as pro-white as you (racially aware people have no big differences on the aspect of race) but his economic approach is different, and I shall say, weird.

You, Andrew, seem 1) not to care to find and learn who are you talking to 2) not to know what mutualism even means. This is a recipe for failure. And so your economic arguments are not good.

The nazi regime was not a socialist regime, it was basically keynesian. In theory there was an ideological fraction that was full socialist but politically it took the form of strasserism. (Do you know that ideology? I suggest to you not to go into this path). Hitler was not a strasserite, in fact he killed there ****.

Now, if you want to defend that fiat money is good, you have to have some (keynesian) arguments about it. This position though, i think, is blatantly wrong. GD current position is that money has to have some guarantee, not meaning metals, but a revitalized national production. So Golden Dawn is against dropping the euro and issuing a fiat money right now. In other words production first. The Austrian School and the Chicago school (i don’t like the second) have plenty of argument of what would the unintended consequences be if you artificially boost demand. This problem cannot be solved by anathematizing them all as Jews. You said that fiat money is good. What is this economically? It is keynesianism. Who is the best proponent of this school now? Krugman, a Jew. Who was Keynes who first though it? An antinazi with many Jewish friends. See…

And there’s another one argument which is overly stupid. You say that “the individual caring first for his own needs above all others” is an alien idea with no analog in the natural world. Wtf?! 99% of the people on the Earth would say that you’re crazy or stupid. And putting it that way shows how not well-read you are. Indeed nationalism and socialism espouse the idea that one should not care first for himself, but no one would dare to say that thing you wrote. EVERYWHERE we see, as nationalists, this phenomenon, and your “narrative” should urge people to overcome this phenomenon which penetrates our lives. But arguing that it doesn’t exist. If we’re living in a world where everyone is putting the others before himself then why are you striving to accomplish what? It seems you don’t know well what nationalism and socialism really means.

(I’m not saying that I agree to this idea “caring first for others”, I am saying how this idea is related to socialism and nationalism)

And coming to a third argument that I saw and I think it is wrong. About this concentration thing you write. It is true that concentrated big wealth is better than wealth in tiny pieces, but how is this bad if each and every person concentrates the wealth that he and his ancestor created? Jews create wealth and concentrate it in a big factory. They have the factory. You and your ancestors do the same. Where in the **** do you see any theft, injustice, or something to be fixed? Let’s imagine your ancestors were boors and I have a factory and you don’t. Is there anything to be fixed? I personally don’t see it this way. And asking people to see it this way is asking them to think like parasites.

To my opinion redistribution is theft. And now we come to a final point I want to make. You, as many other nationalists think that libertarianism and free trade is an ideology which comes with **** pissing at your porch. I don’t see anything like that. People can be denied entrance in a country or even deported, while goods can come in or go out. What is your problem with me trading a good which I made with another good that a **** or a Jew made in their countries? Transportation of a good is not immigration of an individual.

Anyways, this site cannot convert any significant number of people to anything and its narrative is not good. The fusion of white nationalism and libertarianism is to me a good think and can be a consistent ideology. Every time in history that fascism rose as a movement this was partly due to a reaction of the middle class (traditionally pro-free market class) to some event or threat. Without the middle class you’re doomed. And rethinking such things as natural and as age-old and as well sounding as free trade is something that will help your movement influence politics.

My channel on youtube is marmiteman6 (not 4) , twitter: PlaceInTheSun2 , so please don’t make articles on how you responded to comments, it’s too amateurish, and if you want to talk about narrative don’t do it in public cause people will think you’re about to fool them with pretty words. Narrative, propaganda, spamming, do them but never admit you did them.